Jump to content

Talk:You Don't Know Jack (franchise)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Hey, don't wanna start any thing, but this page looks alot like another one I just came from: [1]

Being forced to answer a question

[edit]

I distinctly remember a humerous aspect of the game. In a multi-player game, if nobody buzzed in and one of them had a substantial amouont of money, the host would ask something like "What? Nobody wants to answer? Hey player (with substantial amount), you've got money to lose, you give it a try." The player would be buzzed in and forced to answer the question. Amount of money gained or lost from answering right or wrong stayed the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.18.60 (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can't remember? come on, DON'T BE A WIMP! Sorry... what were we saying? VmKid (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the sudden accolades for Buzz

[edit]

I thought most players hated Buzz and that's why he gets his ass kicked in his cameo in The Ride. Why on earth do we suddenly have a huge outpouring of enthusiasm for him and a list of companies that have approached him? Shouldn't this information be in an article about him and not in the main description?

Agreed.

[edit]

I was also convinced that nobody liked Buzz's 'nasal' speech, wikipedia is the first time I've read anything differently. I always heard that nobody liked the 'change of host' when Volume 2 came around, because they preferred the original host, and thought Buzz was irritating. --CherryMay 09:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed

[edit]

I reverted it back to the original version, due to A: Overwhelming agreement of dislike and B. No evidence of the offers made by companys.

Screwed

[edit]

For some reason I remeber that in one YDKJ game (possibly the first) that you could "screw" other players, and a screw would impale their number and they would have to answer the current question. 24.240.41.48 21:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Available in versions 1-4 (US), and 1-3 (foreign territories), and it's called Screw Your Neighbo(u)r Elcondor 11:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In YDJK 4: The Ride, it was more than just making your opponent answer the question. The person administrating the Screw Your Neighbor would press the S key repeatedly, and the screen would fill with screws, making the question hard to read in addition to making the opponent answer the question. It should also be noted that if you tried to Screw Your Neighbor, but didn't pick another player, the screw would come back to you, thereby screwing yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.18.117 (talk) 12:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's in all of 'em except for the online versions (excluding NetShow). VmKid (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality dispute

[edit]

Someone has tagged this article as needing a discussion regarding its neutrality. I cannot see what the problem is, and the individual in question has not given any reasons. However, rather than immediately remove the flag, I'm going to leave this discussion open for people to state their case. If no-one does after a reasonable period of time, the tag will be removed. Elcondor 13:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a few examples:
  • Clever text art
  • ranging from the sublime to the ridiculous
  • an amusing but crushing punishment
  • still quite popular today
  • one of the most memorable features
Additionally, the article does not source any of it's other claims. --InShaneee 23:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While it's difficult to discuss a game like this without such adjectives, and I can't see what particular claims can't be traced back to Jellyvision or any video game review site. I appreciate that this was written largely by fans, of which I am one.
I've rewritten your specific cases, but feel that I may not be able to provide an NPOV. Elcondor 10:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tag removed - specific cases fixed, no need for continued mark Teque5

Todd Rundgren credit

[edit]

Todd Rundgren is a guitarist with some measure of popularity. In You Don't Know Jack: The Ride, a credit for a 'Todd Rundgren' is listed as providing wickedly awesome guitar licks, or somesort. I can't imagine that this would be some OTHER Todd Rundgren, but I don't know for certain, and can't verify from any other source. Anyone know for certain? If it is the famous guy, I would think that the information would be notable enough to be included in the article. KensterFox 14:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know someone who has contacts at Jellyvision. I'll see what they can find out. Coolgamer 20:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I work at Jellyvision, and I can confirm that the credit is for THE Todd Rundgren. Someone knew someone, etc. KnowsJackSomewhat 22:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Say hi to Harry for me. Coolgamer 18:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Title

[edit]

The proper capitalization of the title is: YOU DON'T KNOW JACK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.185.194.215 (talk) 17:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is disappointing this comment has been ignored for so long. While it is true that the logos for many titles employ ALL CAPS while the title is meant to otherwise be proper case, this does appear to be the case with YOU DON'T KNOW JACK. The title is a phrase that is both an exclamation and American slang (meaning "you don't know anything"). Thus, to me, the all caps are an indication that this exclamation is being shouted--as they usually are--and, thus, intended as part of the official title. But, don't take my word for it, look at the press releases and game materials around it. The property owners appear to nearly always put this title in all caps--even when listing it among other titles that are not.
To see an encyclopedia list this title in proper case is not only incorrect (in my opinion), it flatly ignores the wishes of the property owners and creators, and lessens that encyclopedia overall. Sure, all caps all over the place may make the article uglier... but that shouldn't be the limiter, should it?
Furthermore, not using all caps makes it harder to properly distinguish the odd case of some of titles in the series, such as YOU DON'T KNOW JACK the netshow (not You Don't Know Jack: The Netshow, possibly YOU DON'T KNOW JACK: the netshow). Even weirder: YOU DON'T KNOW JACK Sports the netshow (or YOU DON'T KNOW JACK: Sports: the netshow).
And, yet, also acknowledging that the current property owners (far removed from the original creators, Jellyvision and Berkeley Systems) sometimes resort to proper case for unknown reasons:
Also acknowledging that some early forms on publisher websites included an exclamation mark with proper case like "You Don't Know Jack!" and sometimes all of the above with "YOU DON'T KNOW JACK!":
Or, in other words, we shouldn't be changing capitalization when it changes the meaning like it does here.
juanitogan (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Developer Name Incorrect and Two Other Items

[edit]

Hi, full transparency, I work for Jackbox Games - used to be Jellyvision Games. Anyways, couple large factual things incorrect that I respectfully bring to the editors' attention. First, the company name is actually Jackbox Games and no longer Jellyvision Games. The name change came about this year as part of the finalizing of the split off of Jellyvision Labs - an interactive conversation company. We are the same company that has always been the developer and IP holder for YDKJ - just a new name. So the link for the company website is also now incorrect and it is jackboxgames.com

Second, YDKJ is not only on Facebook now but also iOS and Android (cross-platform between the three casual platforms) and we just came out on Ouya.

Third, IF it is of interest to the editors, YDKJ won the Social Game of the Year category for the SPIKE TV video game awards in 2012 (http://www.polygon.com/2012/12/7/3741630/spike-video-game-awards-2012-trailers)

Thank you for any help in addressing these inaccuracies.

Best,

Marc Alan Blumer (talk) 21:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roku app

[edit]

YDKJ was released as a Roku app on 2013-03-05 — see here — but is not metioned in this article. (Curiously, the Roku app has not been updated since its initial release, and still shows the developer as "JellyVision" both in the channel listing and within the app itself, as the name change from "JellyVision" to "Jackbox" did not take place until a few months after release.) — Jaydiem (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]

German You Don't Know Jack 4 correction

[edit]

Hello, after I read "You Don't Know Jack Vol.4 – carbon copy of U.S. Vol.6 ("The Lost Gold") in German" I was a bit confused because this would indicate that (like Germanys Games 1-3) it is a regionalization of "Lost Gold" and just translates/changes the questions. But in this case it is the other way around: US "Lost Gold" came out on December 1, 2003 while Germanys 4th game came out on September 10, 2003 plus the US version mentions the German game in one of the opening texts, still has the player renamed "Arschloch" (German for "Asshole") when "Fuck You" is typed in by a player during a gibberish question (in German it is the mentioned "Arschloch") and still has US YDKJ 5th D. music in it's files (I did not rechecked this, however: the German game uses music from US YDKJ 5th D.). In comparison to Germans Vol. 4, US Vol. 6 uses new music and added the pirate theme, but graphically it is the same (exept regional changes of course). In my opinion the following should be changed: "You Don't Know Jack Vol.6: "The Lost Gold" – December 1, 2003" should become "You Don't Know Jack Vol.6: "The Lost Gold" – December 1, 2003, based of German Volume 4" and "You Don't Know Jack Vol.4 – carbon copy of U.S. Vol.6 ("The Lost Gold") in German" should become "You Don't Know Jack Vol.4 – foundation for U.S. Vol.6 ("The Lost Gold")" However, I want to discuss this here first. Cedrik Ple (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2000 election questions

[edit]

The article states that: "During the 2000 United States presidential election, David Grenewtzki, president of Sierra On-Line, challenged the presidential candidates to play a political version of You Don't Know Jack. The game had been distributed to a few radio stations and was described as a 'litmus test' of the candidates' political knowledge." There doesn't appear to be any recordings or substantial evidence that the event took place, in addition to there being no source provided. It seems fit that it be removed from the article, so I have already done so. NothingIsHere,NothingAtAll (talk) 01:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:You_Don%27t_Know_Jack_(franchise)&oldid=1262988696"