Jump to content

Talk:Peace and conflict studies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

sources

[edit]

pls do not conflate journalistic attacks on individuals or on the general subdiscipline with the scientific work and arguments being produced in peer reviewed material. It is shoddy. Detailed refs pls from peer reviewed material where nec to keep material live. agreed??

Strategic Foresight Group

[edit]

In the article, the work of the Strategic Foresight Group is highlighted twice. This seems a bit to much given that

  • the article gives a general overview of the field,
  • in most cases, the work of prominent scholars is only referred to,
  • the Strategic Foresight Groups seems not to be of forefront significance (e.g. is not listed in the 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index).

Thus, I would delete both passages. What do you think? -- W.pseudon (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pohui 89.191.245.148 (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frameworks

[edit]

What other frameworks can be included in the theories section to enhance the context of peace and conflict studies? Gekyume!17 (talk) 03:03, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]