This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Article Adam Greenfield listed on WP:VFD Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:
Vanity, and a relatively content-free stub. UninvitedCompany 22:37, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hard to say--probably lean towards delete. Web search hits impressive, but neither msnbc.com, cnn.com, nor even wired.com have heard of him. Niteowlneils 23:06, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete, although only barely. RickK 23:24, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Borderline case. After flipping through some Google hits, I lean toward keep. Plenty of people seem to have heard of both him and his work. Isomorphic 01:17, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. When he's notable enough, he'll find his way back in and we will all be 100% satisfied. Jeeves 18:16, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
But he already is notable enough, apparently. And certainly in a borderline case, we should err on the side of preserving content. Everyking 19:27, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
